عربى
Claes Home Page
Objectives
Achievement
Organizational Structure
CLAES Projects
Expert Systems
online Expert Systems
Publications
Reasearch Staff
Worshops
Collaborating Institutions
intrnal Links
 
Titles
English : Estimating parameters of genotypic and phenotypic stability for some bread wheat genotypes
Arabic : تقدير معالم الثبات الوراثي والمظهري لبعض التراكيب الوراثية في قمح الخبز
Abstract Genotype x environment (GE) interaction is a challenge to plant breeders because it causes difficulties in selecting genotypes evaluated in diverse environments. When GE interaction is significant, its cause nature and implication must be carefully considered. The objective of this study was determine the effect of GE interaction on grain yield, days to heading and maturity heading of bread wheat genotypes as well as stability and adaptability of each genotypes. Phenotypic and genotypic stability parameters were computed as outlined by Eberhart and Russell (1966) and Tai (1971), respectively. Regarding phenotypic stability according to Eberhart and Russell (1966), the results indicated that the following genotypes characterized by general and specific stability. Genotypes no.(1) Giza 165, (2) KAUZ*2/ TRAP// KAUZ, (3) KAUZ*2/YACO// KAUZ, (4) KAUZ* 2/ MNV// KAUZ, (5) Tevee 'S'/Kaus 'S', (6) Mexipak 65, (7) Kaus 'S', (8) MYNA/ VUL// TURACO/3/TURACO, (10) CHAM 2/VEE 'S' and (12) Tevee 'v'// Vee 's'/pvn 'S' for grain yield. Genotypes no.(2) KAUZ*2/ TRAP//KAUZ, (5)Tevee 'S'/Kaus 'S', (6) Mexipak 65, (9)Prl 'S'/Vee 'S'/3/P106. 19//Soty/Jt*3 and (12)Tevee 'v'//Vee 's'/pvn 'S' for heading date. Genotypes no.(2) KAUZ*2/ TRAP//KAUZ, (4)KAUZ*2/MNV//KAUZ and (12) Tevee 'v'/Vee 's'/pvn 'S' for maturity date. Concerning genotypic stability the results showed that genotypes no (1) Giza165, (4) KAUZ*2/ MNV// KAUZ and (11) Seri 82//Shuha 'S' had a degree of below average stability, genotypes no. (3) KAUZ *2 /YACO// KAUZ, (7) Kaus 's', (8) MYNA/ VUL// TURACO/3/ TURACO, (10) CHAM 2/VEE 'S' and (12)Tevee 'v'//Vee 's'/pvn 'S' showed a stability of above average degree and genotypes no. (6) Mexipak 65, and 9 had no average degree of stability for grain yield. Genotypes no. (9)Prl 'S'/Vee 'S'/3/P106. 19//Soty/Jt*3 and (12)Tevee 'v'//Vee 's'/pvn 'S' showed stability of below average degree and genotypes no. (1) Giza 165, (8) MYNA/ VUL// TURACO/3/TURACO and (10) CHAM 2/VEE 's' showed stability of an average degree for maturity date. On other hand, degrees of below average stability were performed by genotypes no. 4, 6, 9 and 10 with respect to heading date.
Publication year 2003
Pages 6603-6617
Availability location 9 شارع الجامعة- الجيزة
Availability number
Organization Name
    Field Crops Research Institute (FCRI)
City القاهرة
serial title جامعة المنصورة للعلوم الزراعية
ISSN 1110-0346
Author(s) from ARC
Agris Categories Agriculture - General aspects
AGROVOC
TERMS
Soft wheat.
Publication Type Journal

 
Please email your suggestions to management@claes.sci.eg